COVID19: Supplies Just-in-Time or Just-Too-Late?
Many failure modes have been attributed to the awful mess that has occurred across the US in supplying frontline healthcare workers and other first responders with sufficient protective equipment (PPE). There is plenty of blame to go around but one of the suspects often cited as a possible causal factor is Just-in-Time inventory practices (for example, this Wall Street Journal article). I would argue for a not guilty verdict.
Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory is a system of replenishing inventory when a signal indicates that more is needed to meet customer demand. For each item, a quantity is determined that will prevent stockouts during the time between orders (including lead time) and allowing for variation in demand. Of course, even a small health care facility stocks hundreds of items; each has its own calculated order quality and signal to reorder.
When life is normal, JIT systems work pretty well—much better than the alternatives in most cases. Most managers have learned that excess inventory results in waste, as items are lost, damaged, or expire. Sometimes in operations with excess inventory, the needed item cannot be located in the sea of excess. Thus, the wide adoption of JIT in healthcare facilities.
But what about when life isn’t normal—when there is a surge in demand?
Sometimes surges occur that outstrip the ability of the supply network to quickly respond. A surge will defeat any inventory plan that is based on continued normal times, whether it is JIT or not. The answer lies in identifying ahead of time those items that are strategic in providing healthcare, and managing those items differently. Mature supply chain risk management programs identify areas where supply risk or demand surges may occur, and plan accordingly. Often, the recommend solutions are strategic inventory or reserve capacity.
Although each health care facility can and should maintain a strategic supply of, for example, PPE, an epidemic will cause a surge that would soon overwhelm even a healthy strategic supply at the facility level. For such a situation, a needed back-up must be provided by a central source—usually the government. Such a back-up can take the form of strategic reserve (inventory) or reserved capacity in manufacturing and distribution that can be called upon immediately when a surge requires it. Both inventory and capacity reserves were insufficient for even a much less widespread emergency than COVID 19. In the presence of such a central source of supply for emergencies, individual hospitals can factor that into their strategic inventory decisions, creating more efficiency during normal times while planning for abnormal times.
Many points of failure can be identified in managing emergency supplies of PPE during this pandemic. Although blame is not helpful at this point, accountability is necessary. Such accountability requires that lessons be learned and that countermeasures that address the causes be put in place so that we never face this problem again. Citizens expect the federal government to prepare for wars. As Bill Gates noted in his 2015 Ted talk, we do so by investing in capabilities for when the time comes; the same approach should be taken towards pandemics.
Meanwhile, I am grateful for all of the brave souls who are saving lives at heightened risk to their own health because they lack sufficient protective gear. Shamefully, supply was governed by a Just-Too-Late system.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
First, I believe in JIT manufacturing as a proper goal where feasible. Also, I agree that regardless of the mfg method the covid pandemic would have been too much to handle.
While "blame" would be wrong, it is hard to refute that if more companies had held onto wasteful amounts of excess inventory (since logical emergency reserves didnt exist) the PPE shortage would not have been as severe.