Complexity Leadership: Insights on Adaptability from Professor Mary Uhl-Bien

Mary Uhl-Bien’s career journey is a testament to adapting leadership theories to reflect the complexities of real-world practice. From her foundational work on Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) to pioneering complexity leadership, Uhl-Bien offers a roadmap for understanding leadership in dynamic environments. 

Moving Beyond Traditional Leadership Models 

Mary Uhl-Bien, the BNSF Railway Endowed Professor of Leadership at Texas Christian University, began her career immersed in Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), a groundbreaking concept in leadership studies at the time. However, she soon recognized its limitations. "LMX didn’t reflect the realities of leadership," she explains. "One of the major issues was how researchers used the same metrics for leaders and followers, which doesn’t work. Leaders and subordinates have fundamentally different needs and views on relationships. For example, managers value clarity and accountability, while subordinates often prioritize trust and support." 

This disconnect inspired her to explore new frameworks. "I moved into relational leadership to study broader dynamics and later transitioned to complexity leadership to understand how systems operate and adapt," she shares. Her journey underscores a commitment to connecting theory with the nuanced realities of leadership in practice. 

Practical Applications of Complexity Leadership 

Uhl-Bien has focused much of her work on applying complexity leadership in organizational settings, particularly in healthcare. "Complexity leadership is rooted in the idea that systems adapt to survive and thrive in changing environments," she explains. This concept, drawn from fields like biology and physics, provides a lens to understand how organizations evolve under pressure. 

During the COVID-19 pandemic, this approach proved invaluable. "Healthcare organizations had to adapt rapidly," she says. "Traditional processes were abandoned, and we saw the creation of what we call ‘adaptive space,’ or conditions that enable the adaptive process to occur. Adaptive space involves loosening rigid structures to allow for experimentation, innovation, and implementation of adaptive solutions. It happened naturally during COVID. The key is getting it to happen in non-crisis situations." 

Her work at Cook Children’s and Texas Health Resources (THR) showcases how complexity leadership can drive organizational resilience. "Cook Children’s has been using the complexity leadership model for 10 years," she shares. "Their executives are fluent in its language and practices. At Texas Health, which has over 30,000 employees, we’re in conversation about integrating the model more widely. It’s incredibly rewarding to see these ideas have a tangible impact." 

Teaching Leadership in Ambiguity 

Uhl-Bien also brings these concepts into her classroom, particularly with undergraduates. "Undergraduates are a different challenge," she notes. "They’re used to structured environments, so they struggle with ambiguity. In my senior leadership course, I tell them, ‘I’m no longer your professor—I’m your manager. You’re part of the senior leadership team now.’" 

This approach places students in open-ended scenarios where they must self-organize to solve real-world challenges. "It’s uncomfortable for them at first because they want clear instructions," she says, "but by the end, they learn to navigate complexity and lead in uncertain situations. It’s a critical skill for their growth as leaders and followers." 

The Disconnect Between Research and Practice 

One of Uhl-Bien’s main critiques of academic leadership research is it’s disconnect from real-world application. "Leadership research often oversimplifies the complexity of real-world leadership," she argues. "Researchers tend to prioritize statistical rigor over applicability, producing findings that are technically correct but not useful for practitioners." 

To bridge this gap, she advocates for more collaboration with practitioners and cross-disciplinary approaches. "The goal should be to develop theories and frameworks that reflect the reality of leadership in practice," she emphasizes. "We need to rethink our methods to better capture the dynamic, adaptive nature of leadership and followership as they happen in organizations." 

A Vision for Leadership Development 

Uhl-Bien is optimistic about the future of leadership education and development. "Leadership isn’t about control," she says. "It’s about enabling systems to work together dynamically." 

For large institutions like Ohio State, she recommends cohort-based programs to create meaningful leadership development opportunities. "Students need safe spaces to build relationships, get feedback, and develop their leadership skills," she explains. "Even in large institutions, you can create smaller groups that foster connection and deeper learning." 

Mary Uhl-Bien’s insights highlight the importance of embracing complexity in leadership. Whether through academic research, practical application, or classroom instruction, her work equips leaders to adapt and thrive in an ever-changing world. 

Click here to learn more about Mary Uhl-Bien's research.